Sunday, April 17, 2005
The NY Times (why do I read the NY Times anyway?) seems to think that Cardinal Ratzinger is leading the pack. They claim he has about fifty votes, which would be far more than the competition. On the other hand, it means that he has 117 minus 50 (67) no-votes. Who will it be? Its getting wild and wooly, as Dan Rather said on Election night in 2000.
Posted by gwb at 2:33 AM