tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10205805.post5509048099071519267..comments2023-10-09T10:54:03.005-05:00Comments on Whitehall: a glimmer of hope in dark timesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10205805.post-66585882321597501132007-01-10T15:21:00.000-05:002007-01-10T15:21:00.000-05:00It seems to me that Bishop Iker is correct in asse...It seems to me that Bishop Iker is correct in assessing this report as essentially toothless, but with lots of 'moral high ground.' I'd love to see how the militant feminists take this. Of particular concern was the sentence Bp. Iker noted, "no diocese or parish should be compelled to accept the ministry of word or sacrament from an ordained woman" and its possible application to PB Schori. On the one hand, the report expects all provincial canons to be binding; on the other, it opens up space for conscientious rejection of PB Schori's leadership on grounds of sex. Does this mean Fort Worth could disallow PB Schori from presiding at the consecration of their next bishop? Who, then, would do that, and upon what grounds?<br /><br />interesting stuff.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00347789123483096164noreply@blogger.com